Home | Publications | ISQ | 2013 ISQ Issues (v.25) | Summer 2013 (v.25 no.2) | Institutional Altmetrics (Roemer & Borchardt)
ISQ Summer 2013 cover

Information Standards Quarterly


ISSN: 1041-0031

Summer 2013, v.25, no.2

Current Issue   Archives

 

   
Article Title: Institutional Altmetrics and Academic Libraries
Download PDF format

 

Author(s): Robin Chin Roemer and Rachel Borchardt
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3789/isqv25no2.2013.03
Citation: Roemer, Robin Chin and Rachel Borchardt. Institutional Altmetrics and Academic Libraries. Information Standards Quarterly, Summer 2013, 25(2): 14-19.
Abstract: While the concept of altmetrics has matured considerably in the three years since the altemetrics manifesto was released, the idea of the “one”—that solo he or she who turns to altmetrics to filter or analyze a collection of sources—has remained largely consistent in the movement’s development. The result of this focus has been, on one hand, a positive growth in the number of altmetrics tools customized to the needs and products of individual users. On the other hand, proportionately little attention has been paid to date to the development of core altmetrics tools for scholars identified in the institutional aggregate. From the perspective of academic librarians—a professional group that has long championed the importance of scalable scholarly filters—this contrast is part of a larger challenge that altmetrics faces in the tenure–and–administration dominated world of higher education. In this article, we take a moment to examine a few ways in which altmetrics has begun to address the needs of institutions and, more specifically, the key roles that librarians can play as partners, liaisons, and advocates in such endeavors.
References and Links:
  1. Priem, Jason, Dario Taraborelli, Paul Groth, and Cameron Neylon. Altmetrics: A manifesto. Altmetrics.org. October 26, 2010.

  2. Galligan, Finbar, and Sharon Dyas-Correia. "Altmetrics: Rethinking the Way We Measure." Serials Review, March 2013, 39 (1): 56-61.
    doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2013.01.003

  3. The Thomson Reuters Impact Factor. Thomson Reuters, June 20, 1994.

  4. 4. The Citation Connection. About the Web of Knowledge. Thomson Reuters.

  5. Scopus [website]. Elsevier.

  6. VIVO [website]. Cornell University.

  7. Konkiel, Stacy, and DaveScherer. "New Opportunities for Repositories in the Age of Altmetrics." Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, April/May 2013, 39 (4): 22-26.
    doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bult.2013.1720390408

  8. ImpactStory [website].

  9. "Choosing reference sets: Good compared to what?" Total-Impact Blog, September 13, 2012.

  10. Introducing PlumX [video]. Plum Analytics, January 24, 2013.

  11. Research Information Network. Communicating knowledge: How and why UK researchers publish and disseminate their findings. London: Research Information Network, September 2009.

  12. Seglen, Per O. "Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research." British Medical Journal, February 15, 1997, 314 (7079): 498-502.

  13. Hammarfelt, Björn. Following the Footnotes: A Bibliometric Analysis of Citation Patterns in Literary Studies. Upsala, SE: Uppsala University, May 12, 2012.

  14. Book Citation Index: Completing the Research Picture. Thomson Reuters.

  15. Web of Science [website]. Thomson Reuters.

  16. Gorraiz, Juan, Phillip J. Purnell, and Wolfgang Glänzel. "Opportunities for and limitations of the Book Citation Index." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, July 2013, 64 (7): 1388-1398.
    doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.22875

  17. Mendeley [website].

  18. Social Science Research Network (SSRN ) [website].

  19. Piwowar, Heather, and Jason Priem. "The Power of Sltmetrics on a CV." Bulletin of the Association for Information Science & Technology, April/May 2013, 39 (4): 10-13.

  20. Altmetric [website].

  21. Elsevier Acquires Mendeley, an Innovative, Cloud-based Research Management and Social Collaboration Platform. Press Release. London: Elsevier, April 9, 2013.

  22. PLOS [website].

  23. LibGuides.

  24. Lapinski, Scott, Heather Piwowar, and Jason Priem. "Riding the crest of the altmetrics wave: How librarians can help prepare faculty for the next generation of research impact metrics." arXiv.org, May 15, 2013.

  25. SPARC: The Scholarly Publishing & Academic Resource Coalition [website].

  26. Hammarfelt, Björn. "Interdisciplinarity and the intellectual base of literature studies: citation analysis of highly cited monographs." Scientometrics, March 2011, 86 (3): 705-725.
    doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0314-5

  27. Piwowar, Heather, Jennifer Lin, and Scott Lapinski. "How Libraries Can Empower Scholars (and Scholarly Communications) through Altmetrics." Presented at: ACRL / SPARC Forum: Life beyond the Impact Factor: the promise and perils of article level metrics, American Library Association, Seattle, WA, January 26, 2013.