Help

Icon - KMLM List KMLM List

View email archives for the history of this mailing list.

List Home All Archives Dates Threads Authors Subjects
sushidevelopers - RE: [sushidevelopers] Counter 3 SUSHI question Message Thread: Previous | Next
  • To: Luke Holt <lah@xxxxxxx>, "SUSHIdevelopers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <SUSHIdevelopers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Oliver Pesch <OPesch@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 21:45:28 +0000
Send Email to sushidevelopers@list.niso.org:
Send new message
Reply to this message

I am not aware of any sample clients; however, you are correct, the report should have separate metric types for search_reg and search_fed etc.

 

Thanks

 

From: sushidevelopers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:sushidevelopers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Luke Holt
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 4:29 PM
To: SUSHIdevelopers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sushidevelopers] Counter 3 SUSHI question

 

Hello,

I'm trying to create a COUNTER 3 compliant web service with SUSHI.  I've had trouble finding sample clients that support CR2 and database reports so I've been looking at the examples at http://www.niso.org/workrooms/sushi/reports_R3/

I've been looking at CR2.  http://www.niso.org/apps/group_public/download.php/5140/counter3_0_example_cr2.xml

The output under ItemPerformance blocks shows categories SEARCHES and SESSIONS in use with a single instance of metric type count. I've noticed the same thing for DB1.  It seems like these reports should actually include the federated search and federated session data rather than just totals for session and search.  Are the examples on that website correct or should there be some representation of federated numbers in the SUSHI/Counter reports?  If so, what is the correct way to do this?

I've been wondering if there should be two instances per category using the metric types of session_fed and session_reg, etc.

Something like this within an item performance block:

<coun1:Category>Searches</coun1:Category>
                        <coun1:Instance>
                           <coun1:MetricType>search_reg</coun1:MetricType>
                           <coun1:Count>0</coun1:Count>
                        </coun1:Instance>
                        <coun1:Instance>
                           <coun1:MetricType>search_fed</coun1:MetricType>
                           <coun1:Count>0</coun1:Count>
                        </coun1:Instance>

rather than the example version:

<ItemPerformance>

<Period>

<Begin>2009-01-01</Begin>

<End>2009-01-31</End>

</Period>

<Category>Sessions</Category>

<Instance>

<MetricType>count</MetricType>

<Count>4</Count>

</Instance>

</ItemPerformance>

Luke

 





EBSCO Industries

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. It may contain information which is covered by professional or other privilege. If you 
are neither the intended recipient of this email nor the person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use of it is strictly 
prohibited. Please notify the sender immediately by reply email and then delete it from your system. EBSCO accepts no liability for any loss or damage suffered by any person arising from the use of this email. 

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

By Date: Previous | Next Current Thread By Thread: Previous | Next