Help

Icon - KMLM List KMLM List

View email archives for the history of this mailing list.

List Home All Archives Dates Threads Authors Subjects
sushidevelopers - Re: [sushidevelopers] Counter XML Question Message Thread: Previous | Next
  • To: "Kim, Tae" <Tae.Kim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Michael T. Puff" <mtpuff@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:59:12 -0700
  • Cc: "sushidevelopers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <sushidevelopers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Send Email to sushidevelopers@list.niso.org:
Send new message
Reply to this message
For me, this begs the question of intent on the part of COUNTER. Are we creating an xml version of the existing COUNTER JR1 report or are we creating an xml report with the base data so that the user can create a JR1 report? The way I read the COUNTER Code of Practice leads me to believe the former. If it is the latter, I think more guidance is required.

-Michael

On Apr 20, 2009, at 3:43 PM, Kim, Tae wrote:

The idea is the pdf and html counts should be split up monthly as well. Of course, if the sushi service doesn’t store that data at that granular level and instead just as a YTD total, that data can’t be returned in a sushi call anyway because the requestor can request stats for an arbitrary length of months, for example Nov 2007 to Feb 2008.

-Tae Kim


On 4/20/09 3:35 PM, "Michael T. Puff" <mtpuff@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

It would seem to me that multi-month would be required for a proper COUNTER JR1 report. The monthly counts represent ft_total which can be a combination html, pdf, etc. While the JR1 "YTD TOTAL" column is a simple sum of the monthly columns (and admittedly redundant), the JR1 columns for "YTD HTML" and "YTD PDF" cannot be derived from the monthly counts. I think you would need multi- month instance to report these two figures as ft_html and ft_pdf else the report would not meet the JR1 specification.

-Michael

On Apr 20, 2009, at 9:09 AM, Dennis Vaux wrote:


At Innovative, we have coded our SUSHI client to ignore any period counts for periods that span more than one month. I agree that no one needs this "summary" data, but it isn't explicitly prohibited by the xsd, and we were unsuccessful when we tried to get Scholarly Stats to stop sending these summary counts in their SUSHI response when we first tested SUSHI 1.0 with them.


-----Original Message-----
From: Kim, Tae   [mailto:Tae.Kim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009   9:30 AM
To: sushidevelopers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:   [sushidevelopers] Counter XML Question

I’m working with Proquest sushi service and they return the stats for every month and a total for all the months.

For example if I ask for Jan-March, it   returns something like:
2008-01-01 to 2008-01-31: 3 requests
2008-02-01   to 2008-02-28: 4 requests
2008-03-01 to 2008-03-31: 1   requests
2008-01-01 to 2008-03-31: 8 requests

I’d LIKE to tell them that really, the last is redundant and spans multiple months so it shouldn’t be in the result.
But really, I can’t find anything in the SUSHI or COUNTER standard that dictates that each data point should be exactly one month in duration.

The xsd of course can’t really validate  anything like   this.

Can anybody point me to something in the standard? Usage stats spanning multiple months is kinda problematic for me and I imagine for other clients as well.

Tae Kim
Software Developer
Serials   Solutions



---------------------
Michael T. Puff

Systems Specialist,
HighWire Press, Stanford University
Phone: 650-723-8348; Fax: 650-725-9335
mtpuff@xxxxxxxxxxxx







---------------------
Michael T. Puff

Systems Specialist,
HighWire Press, Stanford University
Phone: 650-723-8348; Fax: 650-725-9335
mtpuff@xxxxxxxxxxxx




By Date: Previous | Next Current Thread By Thread: Previous | Next

  Mail converted by the most-excellent MHonArc 2.6.16