KMLM List
View email archives for the history of this mailing list.
|
|
|
|
seruinfo - Re: [seruinfo] procedural questions
|
Message Thread:
Previous |
Next
|
- To: J.Morrow@xxxxxxx
- From: Selden Lamoureux <Selden_Lamoureux@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 15:21:41 -0400
- Cc: Jeanne Shuttleworth <jeannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, seruinfo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Send Email to seruinfo@list.niso.org:
- Send new message
- Reply to this message
|
Hi Janet. Thanks so much for your response.
We haven't formalized our workflow to the same extent that you have
(we've been sending an informal email to the publisher to verify that
SERU can be used in a given instance, and then we create a publisher
folder with copies of that information for our files). Would you be
willing to share your template letter (and/or ERM template)?
I am starting to appreciate the fact that it would be better to spell
out our authorized user definition and site definition so that they are
clear to the publisher, either in the initial email we send, or in a
template letter that includes that information (and perhaps other
information as well). I'd love to see what you've come up with.
Thanks in advance!
Selden
********************************************
Selden Durgom Lamoureux
Electronic Resources Librarian
North Carolina State University Libraries
Campus Box 7111
Raleigh, NC 27695-7111
phone: 919-513-2728
fax: 919-515-7282
email: selden_lamoureux@xxxxxxxx
********************************************
J.Morrow@xxxxxxx wrote:
Dear Jeanne -
Currently at Northeastern, if a publisher is listed on the registry for
titles that we wish to access, we would automatically assume we would use
SERU and we would contact the publisher to facilitate that. The only
reason we would not use SERU would be if the publisher came back to us
indicating that there were parts of SERU they didn't want applied to their
content - which hasn't yet happened! We even used SERU to renew our
Springer journal list for 2009.
Once the publisher has been identified as a "SERU publisher", it kicks into
a different workflow where we have templates in place to handle the
internal set-ups in our ERM and we now have a template letter that we can
use as a purchase document that refers to SERU. The rest of the process we
handle like a regular subscription through to access.
Does that help?
janet
Janet Belanger Morrow
Head, Non-Print Management
Northeastern University Libraries
360 Huntington Avenue, 260 SL
Boston, MA 02115
voice: 617-373-4959 fax: 617-373-8396
j.morrow@xxxxxxx
Jeanne
Shuttleworth
<jeannes@xxxxxxxx To
enn.edu> seruinfo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
cc
05/21/2009 11:59
AM Subject
[seruinfo] procedural questions
Hello -
We have recently registered for SERU, and while I understand how the
process works, I wonder if there are others out there willing to share
any information or documents or critieria about how they have
incorporated SERU into their licensing workflow. Do you have criteria
that you apply for deciding whether or not when to evoke the terms when
they are available, or do folks always agree to use SERU when the
publisher has made the option available?
Any best practice or advice would be much appreciated.
Thanks,
Jeanne
--
Jeanne Shuttleworth
Assistant Director, E-Resources and Serials
and
Head, Electronic Acquisitions
University of Pennsylvania Libraries
tel 215.898.7563
jeannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
|