Help

Icon - KMLM List KMLM List

View email archives for the history of this mailing list.

List Home All Archives Dates Threads Authors Subjects
ncipinfo - Re: [ncipinfo] Structured vs. Unstructured Version 1 or Version 2... Message Thread: Previous | Next
  • To: "Gray, Robert" <Robert.Gray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: sboettcher@xxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2011 11:26:48 -0600
  • Cc: ncipinfo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send Email to ncipinfo@list.niso.org:
Send new message
Reply to this message

My vote is for structured name and address fields.  This allows the client
application the flexibility to display or print the data in any format
without requiring parsing logic which would could be unique for each system
and possibly locale.




Sue Boettcher | Sr Product Development Specialist
3M Track & Trace EBO
3M Center, 209-1S-03 | St. Paul, MN, 55144-1000
Office: 651 733 8719 | Fax: 651 736 5409
sboettcher@xxxxxxx | www.3M.com





|------------>
| From:      |
|------------>
  
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |"Gray, Robert" <Robert.Gray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>                              
                                                           |
  
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| To:        |
|------------>
  
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |"ncipinfo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ncipinfo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>                            
                                                           |
  
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Date:      |
|------------>
  
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |01/07/2011 12:54 PM                                                          
                                                           |
  
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Subject:   |
|------------>
  
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |[ncipinfo] Structured vs. Unstructured Version 1 or Version 2...             
                                                           |
  
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Sent by:   |
|------------>
  
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |<ncipinfo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>                                                     
                                                           |
  
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|





From a Initiator point of view - please let me know your preferences:

      1.       Structured or Unstructured Name Fields.
      2.       Structured or Unstructured Address Fields (Home, Work, etc.)

You can either reply to the group or to me individually.

Thank you.

Rob Gray

Context:  Polaris currently uses Structured Names and Structured Address
fields.  The thought at the time was to not force the client application to
parse Unstructured fields and the client would have a consistent display
from responder to responder.

GIF image

GIF image

GIF image


By Date: Previous | Next Current Thread By Thread: Previous | Next