Home | Public Area
#00141 Comment Details - RP-12-201x_Physical Delivery_draft_for_public_comment_final.pdf
| Document Information | |||
| Title | NISO RP-12-201x, Physical Delivery of Library Resources (draft for public comment) | ||
| File Name | RP-12-201x_Physical Delivery_draft_for_public_comment_final.pdf | State | Final |
| Date Added | 2011-07-07 13:54:17 | Revision Number | 0 |
| Submitter Name | Cynthia Hodgson | Size | 908K |
| Comment Information | |||
| Summary | Table 1: Methods for Affixing Labels |
State (Disposition) | New (Unresolved) |
| Date Added | 2011-08-19 10:47:50 | Last Updated | 2011-08-19 10:47:50 |
| Submitter Name | Paula Kelsall | Assigned To | Unassigned |
| Company Name | Library and Archives Canada | Response | None |
| Interest Category | Category | N/A | |
| Origin | Public Review | Section, Page, Line | Section 4.2, Page 18 |
| Item | Item Description | ||
| Submitter Comment |
I would be interested to know why the 3M brand Post-It note has a Low environmental impact while the Avery label has a High impact. Also, the use of the word Poor to describe the environmental impact of Thermal paper is inconsistent with the Low-High scale used for the rest of the choices. |
