Home | Public Area
Comment #00114 - ISO 28560-2 rather than ISO 28560-3 - RP-6-201x_RFID-in_US_Libraries_rev_for_comment.pdf
<< Previous Comment in Document | Next Comment in Document >> Document Details
|
Comment 114
New (Unresolved)
|
 NISO RP-6-201x, RFID in U.S. Libraries (Draft for Comment) (Revision 0) |
|
Comment Submitted by Chuck Flaherty 2011-06-08 04:35:27 |
It is not clear to me why ISO 28560-2 is being proposed and not ISO 28560-3. It is my understanding that there are very few libraries in the US currently using the first, and there are hundreds of libraries using the latter, with millions of ISO 28560-3 encoded tags currently in use. I understand that our system, and likely many others will not have a major problem in accommodating both data formats, but I do not understand why libraries should have to make such changes when the -3 (Danish model) has proven so effective and is in such wide spread deployment. |
| Submitter Proposed Solution |
Allow for the ongoing use of the ISO 28560-3 within the proposed NISO standard. |